News RSS Feed


Parents’ plea for death case driver

10:46am Saturday 5th July 2008

comment Comments (9)   Have your say »

By Nadia Jefferson-Brown »

THE parents of a woman who died after being struck by a taxi urged magistrates to be lenient with the driver.

Lucie Brabyn’s parents – speaking after Gary Crowther was convicted of driving without due care and attention in an early morning accident in York– said he too had suffered greatly.

Crowther’s Renault Kangoo taxi struck the 22-year-old York woman as she was walking in the road last August.

Crowther, from Waite Close, Pocklington, had denied one count of driving without due care and attention.

But he was convicted at the end of a trial heard by Selby magistrates, sitting in Leeds.

The chairman of the bench, Dr Bob Grice, told Crowther: “In addition, we can find no evidence that the collision was not the cause of Lucie’s death.”

Duncan Heath, prosecuting, said: “I have been asked by the family to make it plain they do not seek in any way a harsh sentence. They feel Mr Crowther has suffered a great deal and suffered enough.”

The magistrates imposed a 12-month suspended sentence, three penalty points on Crowther’s licence, and ordered him to pay £100 towards prosecution costs.

“This is one of the most upsetting cases and awful decisions we have had to make,” Dr Grice said.

The court heard Crowther was driving a couple home after picking them up in the town centre when he struck Lucie at 1.45am, in the area where Fawcett Street merges with Paragon Street.

Mr Heath said that, upon hitting Lucie, Crowther, 51, braked before pulling over and calling an ambulance. She suffered head injuries, and died half-an-hour later in hospital.

“Mr Crowther’s driving at the time fell below the standard of a competent and careful driver,” he said.

“His front seat passenger, Kurt Slater, spotted Lucie. This was before Mr Crowther did, as he was looking to check for traffic coming from his left, despite it being 2am and the traffic was extremely light.

“Lucie was there to be seen; if he was looking forward he would have seen her in the road.”

Mr Heath said Lucie bounced off the bonnet into the road.

Mr Slater said that despite having drunk a lot, he was sober enough to see Lucie in the road.

He said: “The driver wasn’t driving too fast or distracted, but I saw her a split second before he did.”

The court heard differing views on where Lucie was in the road at the time, and whether Crowther’s first point of being able to see her was 22.6 metres away or 20 metres.

But Dr Grice said: “We believe at the centre of this case is whether or not a competent driver would have seen Lucie and taken avoiding action.

“He was looking to his left. At no point did he see Lucie until the collision.”

After the accident, Crowther said in interview: “I was checking on my left-hand side for traffic and merging into the middle lane when I heard a bump and crack.

“I got out of the car and saw her. I just couldn’t believe it. That’s when I called the ambulance.”

The court heard that Crowther, a father-of-three and the family breadwinner, had been working as a taxi driver in York for five years with Ebor Cars.

Julian Tanikal, defending, said: “He has been so traumatised by this he has been unable to go back onto night shifts.

“He will be seeking counselling. He will have to live with this for a very long time.”

Your Say YourPress

Mullarkian, York says...
12:03pm Sat 5 Jul 08

Tragic for the taxi driver but he was on a loser at that junction anyway because there's no way you can look straight ahead and left at the same time. If the accident had happened because he hadn't looked left he would have been done for that instead. He certainly should not have been given a suspended sentence for something that was unavoidable

Pedro, York says...
4:32pm Sat 5 Jul 08

A court has decided that man's driving caused somebodies death. He will have to carry that around with him the rest of his life. When he passed his test was he tested on how well he could deal with people suddenly appearing on the road when the Highway Code said he needed to checking other traffic? No the test said something like "I want you to do an emergency stop when I say NOW." That is all. We have driving simulators now so why not have to pass a test where a range of unexpected and random events has to be dealt with? This court has found the driving test guilty - not the person who passed.

Bemused, York says...
5:45pm Sat 5 Jul 08

This court has found the driving test guilty - not the person who passed.

Rubbish, he was guilty of driving without due care and attention and causing a death because of this. The sentence was very lenient, disqualification for a few years would have been very appropriate, and a re-test.

Geoffers, Wigginton says...
5:52pm Sat 5 Jul 08

Mullarkian wrote:
Tragic for the taxi driver but he was on a loser at that junction anyway because there's no way you can look straight ahead and left at the same time. If the accident had happened because he hadn't looked left he would have been done for that instead. He certainly should not have been given a suspended sentence for something that was unavoidable
Rubbish!
You do not execute a manoeuvre UNLESS it is safe to do so. There is no way on Gods earth that mere mortals can look in two directions at the same time. Therefore you STOP, and check each direction in turn, then move off. That way he couldn't fail to see her.
He simply wasn't looking in the direction he was driving!

Mullarkian, York says...
11:08am Sun 6 Jul 08

Sorry Geoffers - but that junction is not one that you are required to stop at, as you turn right you look for and filter in with traffic coming from the left, which also does not have to stop.
The reason why the pedestrian was walking in the road at 1.45am was not reported but the statement applied to Mr Crowther by the magistrate about his "driving at the time fell below the standard of a competent and careful driver” could surely also apply to the pedestrian: it is a very dangerous place for pedestrians to cross where free flowing traffic from two roads merges into one. The pedestrian was responsible for this accident and no-one else.

Geoffers, Wigginton says...
11:23am Sun 6 Jul 08

Mullarkian wrote:
Sorry Geoffers - but that junction is not one that you are required to stop at, as you turn right you look for and filter in with traffic coming from the left, which also does not have to stop. The reason why the pedestrian was walking in the road at 1.45am was not reported but the statement applied to Mr Crowther by the magistrate about his "driving at the time fell below the standard of a competent and careful driver” could surely also apply to the pedestrian: it is a very dangerous place for pedestrians to cross where free flowing traffic from two roads merges into one. The pedestrian was responsible for this accident and no-one else.
Just because there is no Stop sign, doesn't mean that you must not stop.
It is up to the driver to ensure that it is safe to do the intended manoeuvre. The passenger saw the victim, the driver didn't. He simply wasn't looking in his direction of travel. You hit something from behind then IT IS your fault!

It's the same as following another vehicle out of a junction. It turns to the left, you check the traffic from the right, it stops, you run into it. YOU would blame the other driver. I'd say it was your own fault because you weren't looking were you where going!

Having said that, I suspect we'll never see eye-to-eye on this.

altinkum1, Pocklington says...
1:03pm Sun 6 Jul 08

I think the driver did not stand a chance on that bend .Even if he had been looking forward he could and would not have been able to have avoided her . There is a pelican crossing there just feet away where we can cross safe.

Tinkerbell, york says...
6:23pm Sun 6 Jul 08

It is a very dangerous place to try and cross the road as you are trying to cross over three lanes of traffic. It's not the first time there has been an accident here. I feel for Mr. Crowther. He must have been to hell and back over this. Incidentally, he's a private hire driver if he works for Ebor Cars, not a taxi driver.

altinkum1, Pocklington says...
11:46am Mon 7 Jul 08

At the end of the day nobody was there at the accident but the driver and Lucy. Nobody but solicitor's and expert's and the taxi driver and Lucy's family was at court to hear just what went on . I think Lucys parents know it was a very bad accident. That's why they have compassion and don't blaim the driver. He was not done for causing her death. He will have to live with this the rest of his life and the parent will have to live with the loss of Lucy the rest of theirs.

Your sayYourPress

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE York Press account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?
Lucie Brabyn Lucie Brabyn

Hot Jobs

Your Local Services


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »